All manuscripts such as Original Research Article/ Review Article / Case Report / Short communication, submitted to International Journal of Engineering Research And Generic Science (IJERGS) will be subected to a double blinded peer-review process. In this review process Authors and Reviewer both don't known to each other. IJERGS believe in this process is the best way to ensured the fairest reviewes and opinion of the research work.

The peer review process can be broadly summarized into following steps, although these steps can vary slightly between journals.

Initial Evaluation and Technical Review

The Editor-in-Chief (EIC) checks that the manuscript is appropriate for the IJERGS and is sufficiently original and interesting. If not, the manuscript  may be rejected without being reviewed any further. Editor-in-Chief (EIC) first evaluate all manuscripts and rejected at this stage are insufficient original content, scientific flaws, have very poor grammer or English language or manuscript out side of IJERGS aims and scope or manuscript not written as per IJERGS Guidelines of Authors. Those that fullfill minimum criteria are forwarded to at least two subject experts for review process.

Peer Review Process

1. The Editor-in-Chief (EIC) checks that the manuscript is appropriate for the IJERGS and is sufficiently original and interesting. If not, the manuscript  may be rejected without being reviewed any further.

2.The Editor-in-Chief (EIC) of IJERGS sends invitations to individuals he or she believes would be appropriate reviewers. As responses are received, further invitations are issued, if necessary, until the required number of  reviewers as 2- 4.

3. Potential reviewers consider the invitation against their own expertise, conflicts of interest and availability. They then may be accept or may be decline. If possible, when declining, they might also suggest alternative reviewers from both side.

4. The Editor-in-Chief (EIC) of IJERGS sends a final decision via given E-mail to the author including any relevant reviewer comments. Whether the comments are anonymous or not will depend on the type of peer review that the IJERGS operates.

5. If the manuscript Accepted, the manuscript is sent to final publication. If the manuscript  is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the Editor-in-Chief (EIC) of IJERGS should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article.

Author's Suggestion for the Reviewer

The authors can suggest the peer reviewers as per the following criteria

1. The suggested reviewers should have higher academic standing in the subject area of the submitted Original Research Article / Review Article / Case Report.

2. The suggested reviewers should not be from the author's own Institute or from past Institute.

3. Authors must provide the Institutional / Academic E-mail Id.